Fact-finding
by
a Women's Panel
Syeda Hameed, Muslim Women?s Forum, Delhi
Ruth Manorama, National Alliance of Women,
Bangalore
Malini Ghose, Nirantar, Delhi
Sheba George, Sahrwaru, Ahmedabad
Farah Naqvi, Independent Journalist, Delhi
Mari Thekaekara, Accord, Tamil Nadu
Sponsored by
Citizen?s Initiative, Ahmedabad [India]
April 16, 2002
The fact-finding team met Maya Kodnani, the
BJP MLA from Naroda Patia, one of
the worst affected areas in Ahmedabad. She
has also been named in an FIR as having
participated in the Naroda Patia carnage on
February 28th, 2002.
Ø She showed no remorse at the State
abdicating responsibility. There was nothing the
State could do, she says. "There was a natural
ghrina (hatred) and aakrosh (anger) in
the heart of every Hindu and we could not
control it."
Ø Maya Kodnani?s estimates of the size
of the mobs that attacked Naroda Patia
(50,000 to 1 lakh) far exceed the largest
estimates given by eyewitnesses to the mob
violence. Her claim, therefore, that the Police
were "utterly helpless" in the face of this
flood of anger, appeared untenable.
Ø Maya Kodnani found time to visit Ahmedabad
Station to receive bodies of the
Godhra victims, who are not her constituents.
But not once in over a month has she
found time to visit the Muslim relief camps,
where thousands of her constituents are
strewn around like human debris.
Ø Ms. Kodnani denies even knowing where
all her Muslim constituents have fled.
Ø She also denies any knowledge about
the large number of rapes having occurred at
Naroda Patia during the mayhem.
Ø She admitted that only 16 people were
arrested in the Naroda Patia incidents, out of
which only 5 or 6 remain in jail, while the
rest have been released on bail.
Ø Maya Kodnani claims that this kind
of communal violence is part of Gujarat ki
prakruti and Gujarat ki taasir. It is a natural
part of life, and should be accepted as
such.
Ø She dismissed the FIR lodged against
her as being false merely because it was filed
18 days after the violence. She claimed that
Doordarshan had footage proving that she
was elsewhere at the time.
(A detailed account of the conversation with
Maya Kodnani is attached in Annexure
2.1)
Another case of State participation in the
violence was provided by Laxmipura Village
in Khed Brahma Taluka of Sabarkantha District.
The fact-finding team visited this
village because it had a Mahila Sarpanch,
Nathibehn, whose husband and son have
been identified as leading the mobs who torched
Muslim homes on the evening of
February 27th, 2002. .
Ø Nathibehn was clearly only a puppet
Sarpanch. The de-facto Sarpanch was her
husband Jitu Bhai Patel.
Ø Jitu Bhai Patel and his son Ramesh
Patel (both members of the local VHP unit)
justified the torching of Muslim homes, saying
Godhra was the beginning and that
Muslims always start everything, never the
Hindus. They also claimed that Muslims
from almost every village in Gujarat had gone
to participate in the Godhra ?murders?.
Ø The entire family - Nathibehn, Jitu
Bhai, and Ramesh expressed a great deal of
hatred for Muslims, and said that Muslims
could only live in the village if they followed
village tradition i.e. shaved their beards,
stopped wearing caps etc.
Ø Sarpanch Nathibehn denied knowing
the whereabouts of the Muslims who have
been forced to flee Laxmipura.
(A detailed account of the discussions in Laxmipura
is attached as Annexure 2.2)
While there are examples of elected representatives
actively participating or condoning
violence against Muslims, blaming it on an
"unstoppable flood of Hindu anger", the
fact-finding team also found evidence that
where State actors chose to protect
Muslims, they managed to do so successfully.
Chithroda Village in Khed Brahma
Taluka provides an example. Here the Sarpanch
Keshubhai Patel claims that he got
anonymous phone calls from mob leaders trying
to assess the level of support inside the
village for their entry. He refused to allow
the mobs to enter his village, or harm the 40
odd Muslim families in any way.
(A detailed account of the discussion with
Sarpanch Keshubhai Patel is attached as
Annexure 2.3).
The fact-finding team was convinced that mob
violence was unleashed only in those
areas where the mobs were sure of getting
full support from local leaders and the state
machinery.