Diversion of
Funds to otherwise cash starved pet projects has been a standard devise
used by
governments to make use of cash flow available in disaster
situation.
CAG reported, “Rs.1.43 crore diverted for non-flood works for post
flood relief and
rehabilitation across the state of
In the
In Orissa, Executive Engineers of 20 Public Works Divisions irregularly
diverted and
misutilized funds of Rs.12.39 crore meant for Cyclone Damage Repairs
(CDR) in order to
clear liabilities on non-CDR works and execution of new non-cyclone
related works. [Audit
Report (Civil) Orissa for the year 2000-2001] CAG observed that Orissa
government is
needlessly using scarce resources. Road repair worth Rs.6 lakh in
Kendrapara
district was billed at Rs.60 lakh. Eighteen lakh rupees were spent on
repairing the
official bungalow of a high court judge. The money came from the
National Fund for
Calamity Relief. So far, Rs.29 crore of the Rs.107 crore cyclone fund
has been used by the
bankrupt state government to pay its employees’ salaries.[iii]
Despite the CAG reports, one has not heard of any inquiry or
investigation being ordered
into the hidden beneficiaries of such diversion. Besides being a
corrupt practice, this is
nothing short of injustice to the victims. Since victims are
relatively disorganized
and often kept happy with crumbs from the disaster funds cake, this
method goes relatively
unnoticed.
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has castigated relief
authorities for diverting
a sum of Rs.44.88 crore meant for tsunami relief to "committed
liabilities and
administrative expenditure".[iv]
CAG found that the states diverted as much as Rs.44.88 crore from the
tsunami relief and
rehabilitation kitty:
Andhra Pradesh sent Rs.2 crore for relief to earthquake victims in
J&K and Rs.25 lakh
to Andaman and Nicobar for tsunami relief.
Kerala diverted Rs.11.51 crore to meet administrative expenditure.
CAG has also found that Tamil Nadu government has diverted Rs.11.41
crore received under
the Rajiv Gandhi Rehabilitation package for meeting the committed
liabilities of the
fisheries Department, which was meant for Tsunami affected people.[vi]
In Kerala too, The Opposition had to walked out of the State Assembly
on the issue of
diversion of money meant for Tsunami. T. K. Devakumar of the CPI (M)
alleged that a large
share of the contributions received by the Chief Ministers Tsunami
Relief Fund had been
spent in areas totally unaffected by the tsunami. "For instance, Rs. 9
crores from
the fund been diverted for laying pipes for water supply in Cherthala
and Aroor
constituencies," he alleged. [vii]
These practices by states are not acceptable. The money that is
collected in the name of
the victims has to be spent on them. Meanwhile every attempt was made
by the government to
get fishermen out of the shore line, while making exceptions to allow
tourist / holiday
commercial property development.
Development and aid have thus become new opportunities and more
consumption for the haves,
and displacement of the have-nots from their homes, their lands, and
their resources,
their livelihoods. Justice demands that people be allowed to rebuild
their sustainable
livelihoods in farming, fisheries and local trade in the Tsunami
affected areas. Tsunami
recovery needs above all the recovery of our ecological security, our
common humanity and
the human dignity and human rights of all citizens of the earth,
especially the victims of
disasters like the Tsunami.[viii]
[ii]
Everybody
Loves a Good Calamity by
[L.Y03.eldoc1/y03_/12jul07it1.html]
[iii]
Supercyclone
Rehab Efforts in Orissa Make Hardly Any Progress,
[L.Y01.eldoc1/y01_/27may02it1.html]
[iv]
CAG Finds Flaws in Tsunami Relief, The
[v]
Ground Zero by Shankkar Aiyar. India Today, 1 January 2007. [C.Y00.eldoc1/y00_/01jan07it1.html]
[vi]
CAG
Finds Diversion of Tsunami Funds, The Hindu,
[vii]
Walkout
Over Tsunami Relief fund Issue, The Hindu,
[viii]
Tsunami Recovery: Sustainability, Poverty, and the Politics of Aid by
Dr. Vandana Shiva. 30 May 2007 [L.eldoc1/0705/politics-of-aid.html]