INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE'S AND FORESTS
World over International laws are being used to construct and frame local laws. This section provides an idea of the international conventions and declarations applicable to Indigenous people.
1.. International Conventions applicable to Indigenous people.
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights.
- Protection and Integration of Indigenous and Other
Tribal and Semi-Tribal Populations.
- Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries.
- Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples.
2.. FAQ on international law and indigenous people
3.. World Bank and indigenous people
4.. UN Permanent forum on indigenous issues
5.. Internationally electrifying
judgment on rights of Indigenous people.
International Conventions and Declarations:
The international community has shown increasing concern for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples. Conventions and declarations of the international community provide a broad framework, as well as specific statements regarding the protection of indigenous peoples and their interests, cultures, ways of life, cultural survival, and development. It may be noted that some international instruments relating to indigenous peoples have not been ratified by large numbers of the international community.
The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) have specific significance for indigenous peoples. The Universal Declaration provides a common standard for the human rights of all peoples and all nations, and proclaims the importance of traditional, political, and civil rights, as well as basic economic social and cultural rights. The Covenant spells out civil and political rights and guiding principles based on the Universal Declaration.
The 1957 International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention No. 107, Protection and Integration of Indigenous and Other Tribal and Semi-Tribal Populations in Independent Countries, addresses the right of indigenous peoples to pursue material well-being and spiritual development, and was a first international instrument in specific support of indigenous peoples. Largely because of its view that indigenous peoples should be integrated into the larger society, a view that subsequently came to be seen by many as inappropriate, Convention No. 107 was followed in 1989 by ILO Convention 169, Convention Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries.
Convention No. 169 presents the fundamental concept that the way of life of indigenous and tribal peoples should and will survive, as well as the view that indigenous and tribal peoples and their traditional organizations should be closely involved in the planning and implementation of development projects that affect them. As the most comprehensive and most current international legal instrument to address issues vital to indigenous and tribal peoples, Convention No. 169 includes articles that deal with consultation and participation, social security and health, human development, and the environment. To date, Convention No. 169 has been ratified by only a few countries, and so far by none in the Asian and Pacific Region. India has signed convention 107 but not 169.
Agenda 21 adopted by the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit) in 1992 recognizes the actual and potential contribution of indigenous and tribal peoples to sustainable development. The 1992 Convention on Biodiversity calls on contracting parties to respect traditional indigenous knowledge with regard to the preservation of biodiversity and its sustainable use. The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action emerging from the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights recognizes the dignity and unique cultural contributions of indigenous peoples, and strongly reaffirms the commitment of the international community to the economic, social, and cultural well-being of indigenous peoples and their enjoyment of the fruits of sustainable development.
The United Nation's 1993 Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, developed with the direct participation of indigenous peoples representatives and currently under consideration within the United Nations, addresses issues such as the right to participation, the right of indigenous peoples to direct their own development, the right of indigenous peoples to determine and develop priorities and strategies for the development or use of ancestral territories and resources, and the right to self-determination. The emerging concern for indigenous peoples prompted the United Nations to declare 1993 as the International Year of the World's Indigenous Peoples and the decade from December 1994 as the Indigenous Peoples Decade.
Source: 2005 Asian Development Bank www.adb.org
FAQ on international law and indigenous people ..
click
here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
World Bank and Indigenous people
The World Bank's policy towards indigenous peoples dates back to 1982 and was designed initially to consider the needs of relatively isolated and unacculturated tribal groups affected by development projects. It focused mainly on the protection of land rights and the provision of health services.
In 1991, the World Bank issued a revised policy (OD 4.20) which extends the definition of indigenous peoples to include a much wider array of peoples who maintain social and cultural identities distinct from those of the national societies where they live, who have close attachments to their ancestral lands, and who are often susceptible to being disadvantaged in the development process.
This policy is currently applicable to all Bank-financed projects identified as affecting indigenous peoples. While maintaining the protective measures of the earlier policy, OD 4.20 focuses particular attention on the rights of indigenous peoples to participate in and benefit from development projects. Special procedures are outlined in the policy for incorporating indigenous peoples concerns into Bank-financed projects through the design of Indigenous Peoples Development Plans.
Since OD 4.20 became effective, more than 150 Bank-financed projects worldwide have been identified as affecting indigenous peoples, many of which have Indigenous Peoples Development Plans or strategies for ensuring that indigenous peoples receive culturally-appropriate benefits. While in the past, many of these investments were in the infrastructure and energy sectors, today an increasing number are in the fields of education, health, community development, agriculture, natural resources management and land tenure security.
The World Bank has been engaged in global consultations regarding the revision of its Indigenous Peoples' Policy OD 4.20. The Revised Draft Operational Policy on Indigenous Peoples (Revised Draft OP 4.10) has been developed over the last six years, taking into account inputs from numerous consultations with external stakeholders, including Indigenous Peoples leaders, Civil Society Organizations and borrower governments.
The
period of public comment on the Revised Draft Policy concluded on February
28, 2005. The Revised Draft Policy, together with a report summarizing
the comments, will be forwarded to the Bank's Board of Executive Directors
for consideration of its policy content, including the title of the policy.
Once approved by the Board, Operational Policy 4.10 will replace the existing
Operational Directive 4.20 on Indigenous Peoples.
Source: www.wb.org
Also read: Indigenous People Occupy
World Bank Premises in New Delhi.
The letter denounces the destructive impact
of World Bank investments in forestry and of the liberalisation in timber
products enshrined in the WTO system, which range from the commodification
and destruction of the forests to increasing violence, rape and assassinations.
The letter also clearly states their stand in relation to these institutions:
"We fought against the British and we will fight against the new form of
colonialism that you represent with all our might." . To read
more click here.
UN Permanent forum on indigenous issues :
The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues was established by the ECOSOC
on 28 July 2000 and it held its first session from 13 to 24 May 2002. The
mandate covers economic and social development, culture, the environment,
education, health, and human rights as they apply to indigenous peoples.
A secretariat was established to assist the Permanent Forum on Indigenous
issues in February, 2003.
Website: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/index.html
FOR
COMPREHENSIVE DETAILS ABOUT INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS / ACTIONS ON INDIGENOUS
PEOPLE VISIT :http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/edumat/studyguides/indigenous.html#IV
Internationally appreciated Judgment on Rights of Indigenous People.
Mabo and others v. Queensland (No. 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 F.C. 92/014)
Supreme Court of Australia-
The terra nullis doctrine: Under this doctrine, empty, unsettled or unpopulated land could be claimed by any one who would settle and develop it. South Africa and Australia have been champions of this doctrine. Again, this doctrine is culturally arrogant in that it presupposes that land which is not developed or used as a European would use it, is undeveloped or unpopulated. Many of our environmental problems come from this attitude of exploitation, which cannot accept that the experience of thousands of years of living in a place may have taught the indigenous peoples the best use for their lands.
Full Mabo judgment available on:
http://bar.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/high_ct/175clr1.html
Also read:
"Mabo and Samatha"
Mabo and Samatha are two remarkable judgments of the late Twentieth Century on the rights of aboriginals and tribals. On June 3, 1992, the High Court of Australia decided to declare that all the land which belonged to the aboriginals had been wrongly misappropriated by the white settlers and had to be returned to the aboriginals. Two centuries of colonial history was reversed. White colonials had assumed that the land of the natives was res nullius (owned by no one). The Mabo case judgment was a brave and courageous decision. It had a cathartic influence on the white colonial conscience. It was electrifying for tribal communities throughout the world.
On July 11, 1997, the Indian Supreme Court decided the Samatha case which was no less significant. Breathing new life into the limping Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Constitution, the Supreme Court declared that tribal land was for the tribals to the exclusion of outside corporate industrialists wishing to ruthlessly exploit the area and the tribals.
For full article click here.